By John Hanley
•
24 Feb, 2020
We want to be free. Free to think and operate as we choose. We want to be unconstrained from burdens and obligations. We want to be our own person, unique in our expression. What are we to do, which is to say, how are we to think about our bodies, our parental and societal upbringing, and our friends and family? Are we not trapped inside our body? While this seems at first glace demonstrably true, perhaps various spiritual traditions teach us to identify with an immaterial spirit rather than our corporeal body. If we are an instance of or a participant in the spirit realm, our seeming to be trapped in a body would be in actuality a grand illusion. If we are spirit, is there any constraint within that existence or are possibilities endless? Could the spirit realm, so to speak, possess certain rules of engagement that are nonnegotiable? How about our upbringing from our parents within the larger societal conforming training? Can one truly be free from such influences? In theory a Buddhist monk who had attained satori would have transcended their ego and, therefore, perhaps, let go of all connection to the norms of society. Then again, it appears that, on the surface, at least, Buddhist monks each follow a similar path of meditation, isolation, and style of appearance. What about the enlightened individual who deeply absorbs the reality that their existence (how they perceive themselves and the world) is completely shaped by their upbringing within the cultural understanding of their generation *while* at the same time absorbing that their familiar mode of existence has no objective foundation? Would that sort of individual be free from constraints, or, despite their transcendent enlightenment, would they still be inexorably trapped within their conformist understanding of what's good, bad, right, wrong, appropriate, inappropriate? Even though they "know" all their beliefs are groundless, perhaps they still cannot wipe them out and start from nothing. Does the monk truly attain this total freedom? Or, is there some degree of wishful thinking going on within the monk community and the outsiders' perception of the monk community? And, finally, what about our sense of connection and duty to our family and friends? If freedom is about being independent, what to do about our intuitive desire to connect and form strong bonds of affiliation with others? We instinctively don't want to walk away from the obligations seemingly inherent to strong families and friendships. We want to do the "right" thing and be there for them. We want them to do the right thing and be there for us. When a family member mistreats us, or we perceive that they have, we must be basing our conclusion on some standard of behavior we think carries weight. In conclusion, we grasp for more freedom, while at the same time, hold tightly onto standardized constraints. We want our romantic partner to feel totally free to think how they choose, feel however they do, even act however they choose -- except when it doesn't suit us, as in the case of some infidelity. At the same time, we may feel like we want to be able to do whatever we want whenever we want; then again, in reality, perhaps we intuit that we'd be happier adhering to certain constraints, such as fidelity to our romantic partner. Welcome to John's musings in the dark. I hope you enjoy the reflection.